Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- Cape Verde
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 5.5% against 5.5% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 57th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 60th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.3% | 4.8% | 0.5% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 4.9% | 6.2% | 1.3% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 5.1% | 5.9% | 0.8% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 5.6% | 5.5% | 0.1% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
- Cape Verde, at 5.5% against 5.5% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- Cape Verde ranks 57th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 60th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).