Argentina vs French Polynesia: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- Argentina
- French Polynesia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 4.1% against 4.0% in Argentina, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 100th and French Polynesia ranks 98th of 187 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.9% | 4.2% | 2.7% | Argentina |
| 2000s | 5.6% | 4.2% | 1.4% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 4.9% | 4.2% | 0.7% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 4.1% | 4.1% | 0.0% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), Argentina or French Polynesia?
- French Polynesia, at 4.1% against 4.0% in Argentina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between Argentina and French Polynesia?
- 0.1%, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and French Polynesia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and French Polynesia rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- Argentina ranks 100th and French Polynesia ranks 98th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).