Latvia vs Makroregion południowy: Employed HRST: 2007)
Latvia
425.6
in 2008
Makroregion południowy
1,042
in 2008
Latvia rank
31st
Makroregion południowy rank
32nd
Employed HRST: 2007) over time
- Latvia
- Makroregion południowy
How they compare
Makroregion południowy currently reports 1,042 against 425.6 in Latvia, a difference of 616.4.
That makes Makroregion południowy's figure about 2.4 times Latvia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Makroregion południowy has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 31st and Makroregion południowy ranks 32nd of 40 countries.
Makroregion południowy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Makroregion południowy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 311.3 | 834 | 522.7 | Makroregion południowy |
| 2000s | 341.42 | 872.8 | 531.38 | Makroregion południowy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employed hrst by category, nace rev. 1.1 activity and nuts 1 region, Latvia or Makroregion południowy?
- Makroregion południowy, at 1,042 against 425.6 in Latvia as of 2008.
- What is the difference in employed hrst by category, nace rev. 1.1 activity and nuts 1 region between Latvia and Makroregion południowy?
- 616.4, with Makroregion południowy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Makroregion południowy?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2008.
- How do Latvia and Makroregion południowy rank globally for employed hrst by category, nace rev. 1.1 activity and nuts 1 region?
- Latvia ranks 31st and Makroregion południowy ranks 32nd of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Employed HRST by category, NACE Rev. 1.1 activity and NUTS 1 region (1994 - 2007). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.