Continente vs Latvia: Employed HRST: 2007)
Continente
1,070
in 2008
Latvia
425.6
in 2008
Continente rank
31st
Latvia rank
31st
Employed HRST: 2007) over time
- Continente
- Latvia
How they compare
Continente currently reports 1,070 against 425.6 in Latvia, a difference of 644.4.
That makes Continente's figure about 2.5 times Latvia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Continente has been ahead every year.
Continente ranks 31st and Latvia ranks 31st of 107 regions.
Continente has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Continente | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 752.9 | 311.3 | 441.6 | Continente |
| 2000s | 917.49 | 341.42 | 576.07 | Continente |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employed hrst by category, nace rev. 1.1 activity and nuts 1 region, Continente or Latvia?
- Continente, at 1,070 against 425.6 in Latvia as of 2008.
- What is the difference in employed hrst by category, nace rev. 1.1 activity and nuts 1 region between Continente and Latvia?
- 644.4, with Continente ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Continente and Latvia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2008.
- How do Continente and Latvia rank globally for employed hrst by category, nace rev. 1.1 activity and nuts 1 region?
- Continente ranks 31st and Latvia ranks 31st of 107 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Employed HRST by category, NACE Rev. 1.1 activity and NUTS 1 region (1994 - 2007). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.