Hong Kong vs Latvia: Days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts
Days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts over time
- Hong Kong
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.06 against 0 in Latvia, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 40th and Latvia ranks 43rd of 51 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3 | 12.49 | 12.19 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.4711 | 0.3633 | 0.1078 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 0.5942 | 3.26 | 2.67 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts, Hong Kong or Latvia?
- Hong Kong, at 0.06 against 0 in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts between Hong Kong and Latvia?
- 0.06, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong and Latvia rank globally for days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts?
- Hong Kong ranks 40th and Latvia ranks 43rd of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rates of days not worked due to strikes and lockouts represent the severity rates of strikes and lockouts, calculated in terms of the number of days not worked per 1'000 workers, unless otherwise stated in the notes. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.