Czechia vs United States: Days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts
Days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts over time
- Czechia
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 0.04 against 0 in Czechia, a difference of 0.04.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 43rd and United States ranks 41st of 51 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts, Czechia or United States?
- United States, at 0.04 against 0 in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts between Czechia and United States?
- 0.04, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and United States?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Czechia and United States rank globally for days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts?
- Czechia ranks 43rd and United States ranks 41st of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rates of days not worked due to strikes and lockouts represent the severity rates of strikes and lockouts, calculated in terms of the number of days not worked per 1'000 workers, unless otherwise stated in the notes. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.