Barbados vs New Zealand: Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts

Barbados
530
in 2015
New Zealand
378
in 2019
Barbados rank
63rd
New Zealand rank
66th

Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts over time

  • Barbados
  • New Zealand
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196919942019

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 530 against 378 in New Zealand, a difference of 152.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.4 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1972 it was New Zealand ahead.

Barbados ranks 63rd and New Zealand ranks 66th of 90 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 2,857 201,133 198,276 New Zealand
1980s 6,488 334,150 327,662 New Zealand
1990s 5,057 94,152 89,095 New Zealand
2000s 2,656 34,309 31,652 New Zealand
2010s 265 3,339 3,074 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher days not worked due to strikes and lockouts, Barbados or New Zealand?
Barbados, at 530 against 378 in New Zealand as of 2015.
What is the difference in days not worked due to strikes and lockouts between Barbados and New Zealand?
152, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and New Zealand?
21 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2015.
How do Barbados and New Zealand rank globally for days not worked due to strikes and lockouts?
Barbados ranks 63rd and New Zealand ranks 66th of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs New Zealand: Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/days-not-worked-due-to-strikes-and-lockouts/barbados/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/days-not-worked-due-to-strikes-and-lockouts/barbados/new-zealand/">Barbados vs New Zealand: Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 2,247 data points, 1969–2024
Last refreshed

Days not worked as a result of strikes and lockouts represent the total number of working days not worked as a result of strikes and lockouts in progress during the year. It is measured in terms of the sum of the actual working days during which work would normally have been carried out by each worker involved had there been no stoppage. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.