Aruba vs Belarus: Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts
Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts over time
- Aruba
- Belarus
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 1 against 0 in Belarus, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Aruba ranks 79th and Belarus ranks 81st of 90 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher days not worked due to strikes and lockouts, Aruba or Belarus?
- Aruba, at 1 against 0 in Belarus as of 2013.
- What is the difference in days not worked due to strikes and lockouts between Aruba and Belarus?
- 1, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Belarus?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1996.
- How do Aruba and Belarus rank globally for days not worked due to strikes and lockouts?
- Aruba ranks 79th and Belarus ranks 81st of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Days not worked as a result of strikes and lockouts represent the total number of working days not worked as a result of strikes and lockouts in progress during the year. It is measured in terms of the sum of the actual working days during which work would normally have been carried out by each worker involved had there been no stoppage. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.