Peru vs South Africa: Coverage (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural
Peru
97.4%
in 2022
South Africa
90.6%
in 2021
Peru rank
2nd
South Africa rank
5th
Coverage (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 97.4% against 90.6% in South Africa, a difference of 6.8%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 5th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 87.2% | 88.3% | 1.1% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 90.9% | 6.0% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage (%) -all social protection and labor -rural, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 97.4% against 90.6% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage (%) -all social protection and labor -rural between Peru and South Africa?
- 6.8%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for coverage (%) -all social protection and labor -rural?
- Peru ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 5th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Protection and Labor programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)