Paraguay vs Poland: Coverage of social safety net programs
Coverage of social safety net programs over time
- Paraguay
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 53.3% against 50.1% in Paraguay, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Poland ahead.
Paraguay ranks 15th and Poland ranks 14th of 38 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.2% | 44.0% | 6.8% | Poland |
| 2010s | 59.5% | 38.5% | 21.0% | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs, Paraguay or Poland?
- Poland, at 53.3% against 50.1% in Paraguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs between Paraguay and Poland?
- 3.2%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Poland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Paraguay and Poland rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs?
- Paraguay ranks 15th and Poland ranks 14th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.