Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Coverage of social safety net programs
Coverage of social safety net programs over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 88.2% against 87.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 38 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 91.8% | 24.9% | 66.9% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 87.1% | 88.2% | 1.1% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 88.2% against 87.1% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 1.1%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs?
- Mongolia ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.