Mongolia vs Peru: Coverage of social safety net programs
Coverage of social safety net programs over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 87.1% against 79.8% in Peru, a difference of 7.3%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 4th and Peru ranks 6th of 38 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.9% | 57.0% | 26.9% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 92.2% | 63.0% | 29.1% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 87.1% | 75.0% | 12.1% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 87.1% against 79.8% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs between Mongolia and Peru?
- 7.3%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs?
- Mongolia ranks 4th and Peru ranks 6th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.