Indonesia vs Romania: Coverage of social safety net programs
Coverage of social safety net programs over time
- Indonesia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 59.0% against 54.6% in Indonesia, a difference of 4.4%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 13th and Romania ranks 12th of 38 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 46.3% | 60.8% | 14.5% | Romania |
| 2020s | 35.3% | 59.5% | 24.2% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs, Indonesia or Romania?
- Romania, at 59.0% against 54.6% in Indonesia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs between Indonesia and Romania?
- 4.4%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Indonesia and Romania rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs?
- Indonesia ranks 13th and Romania ranks 12th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.