Ecuador vs Turkey: Coverage of social safety net programs
Coverage of social safety net programs over time
- Ecuador
- Turkey
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 28.1% against 14.5% in Turkey, a difference of 13.6%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.9 times Turkey's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 29th and Turkey ranks 32nd of 38 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.9% | 37.1% | 20.8% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 54.3% | 16.9% | 37.4% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs, Ecuador or Turkey?
- Ecuador, at 28.1% against 14.5% in Turkey as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs between Ecuador and Turkey?
- 13.6%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Turkey?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Turkey rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs?
- Ecuador ranks 29th and Turkey ranks 32nd of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.