Chile vs Georgia: Coverage of social safety net programs
Coverage of social safety net programs over time
- Chile
- Georgia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 78.2% against 66.0% in Georgia, a difference of 12.2%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 7th and Georgia ranks 9th of 38 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 76.6% | 62.0% | 14.6% | Chile |
| 2020s | 63.4% | 64.8% | 1.4% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs, Chile or Georgia?
- Chile, at 78.2% against 66.0% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs between Chile and Georgia?
- 12.2%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs?
- Chile ranks 7th and Georgia ranks 9th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.