Albania vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage of social safety net programs
Coverage of social safety net programs over time
- Albania
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 9.9% against 6.0% in Albania, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.7 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 38th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 34th of 39 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs, Albania or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 9.9% against 6.0% in Albania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs between Albania and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Albania and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs?
- Albania ranks 38th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 34th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.