Panama vs Ukraine: Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile over time
- Panama
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 32.7% against 31.0% in Panama, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ukraine ahead.
Panama ranks 16th and Ukraine ranks 15th of 39 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile, Panama or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 32.7% against 31.0% in Panama as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile between Panama and Ukraine?
- 1.7%, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Ukraine?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Panama and Ukraine rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile?
- Panama ranks 16th and Ukraine ranks 15th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.