Colombia vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile over time
- Colombia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 4.3% against 3.7% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 29th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 31st of 39 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.5% | 3.9% | 4.6% | Colombia |
| 2020s | 3.8% | 3.7% | 0.1% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile, Colombia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Colombia, at 4.3% against 3.7% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile between Colombia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.6%, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile?
- Colombia ranks 29th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 31st of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.