Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 3.7% against 3.6% in Argentina, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Argentina ranks 32nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 31st of 39 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.0% | 2.2% | 1.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 3.9% | 3.7% | 0.2% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 10.0% | 3.7% | 6.2% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 3.7% against 3.6% in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.1%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile?
- Argentina ranks 32nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 31st of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.