Albania vs Ecuador: Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile over time
- Albania
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 2.4% against 1.8% in Albania, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Albania's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 36th and Ecuador ranks 34th of 39 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.1% | 18.4% | 0.4% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 3.4% | 26.9% | 23.5% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile, Albania or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 2.4% against 1.8% in Albania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile between Albania and Ecuador?
- 0.6%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Ecuador?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Albania and Ecuador rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile?
- Albania ranks 36th and Ecuador ranks 34th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.