Armenia vs Brazil: Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile over time
- Armenia
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 64.3% against 59.7% in Armenia, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 21st and Brazil ranks 19th of 39 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.1% | 22.8% | 5.3% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 42.6% | 50.6% | 8.0% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 59.4% | 69.6% | 10.2% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile, Armenia or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 64.3% against 59.7% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile between Armenia and Brazil?
- 4.6%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brazil?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Brazil rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile?
- Armenia ranks 21st and Brazil ranks 19th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.