Argentina vs Indonesia: Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile over time
- Argentina
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 69.4% against 68.9% in Argentina, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Indonesia ahead.
Argentina ranks 18th and Indonesia ranks 17th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 47.2% | 71.8% | 24.7% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 69.3% | 58.0% | 11.3% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile, Argentina or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 69.4% against 68.9% in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile between Argentina and Indonesia?
- 0.5%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Indonesia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Indonesia rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile?
- Argentina ranks 18th and Indonesia ranks 17th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.