Indonesia vs Poland: Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile over time
- Indonesia
- Poland
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 48.9% against 44.2% in Poland, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Poland ahead.
Indonesia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 15th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.5% | 33.4% | 4.0% | Poland |
| 2010s | 35.0% | 30.5% | 4.5% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile, Indonesia or Poland?
- Indonesia, at 48.9% against 44.2% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile between Indonesia and Poland?
- 4.7%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Poland rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile?
- Indonesia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 15th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.