Belarus vs Paraguay: Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile over time
- Belarus
- Paraguay
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 44.0% against 39.5% in Paraguay, a difference of 4.5%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 16th and Paraguay ranks 17th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.0% | 29.3% | 25.8% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 49.9% | 52.8% | 2.8% | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile, Belarus or Paraguay?
- Belarus, at 44.0% against 39.5% in Paraguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile between Belarus and Paraguay?
- 4.5%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Paraguay?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Paraguay rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile?
- Belarus ranks 16th and Paraguay ranks 17th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.