Belarus vs Indonesia: Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile over time
- Belarus
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 48.9% against 44.0% in Belarus, a difference of 4.9%.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 16th and Indonesia ranks 13th of 39 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.3% | 29.5% | 23.8% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 48.9% | 35.8% | 13.1% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile, Belarus or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 48.9% against 44.0% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile between Belarus and Indonesia?
- 4.9%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Indonesia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Indonesia rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile?
- Belarus ranks 16th and Indonesia ranks 13th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.