Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 89.8% against 89.0% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 39 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 92.8% | 20.7% | 72.1% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 89.8% | 89.0% | 0.8% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Mongolia, at 89.8% against 89.0% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 0.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile?
- Mongolia ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.