Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Mongolia: Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
98.7%
in 2021
Mongolia
89.8%
in 2020
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
1st
Mongolia rank
3rd

Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • Mongolia
20406080100200620132021

How they compare

Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 98.7% against 89.8% in Mongolia, a difference of 8.9%.

That makes Bolivia, Plurinational State of's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 3rd of 39 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 66.8% 85.1% 18.4% Mongolia
2010s 79.8% 92.6% 12.9% Mongolia
2020s 99.4% 89.8% 9.5% Bolivia, Plurinational State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Mongolia?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 98.7% against 89.8% in Mongolia as of 2021.
What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mongolia?
8.9%, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mongolia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mongolia rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 3rd of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Mongolia: Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-of-social-safety-net-programs-in-3rd-quintile-percent-of-population/bolivia/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-of-social-safety-net-programs-in-3rd-quintile-percent-of-population/bolivia/mongolia/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Mongolia: Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile (% of population)
Unit
% of population
Source
ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
39 places, 390 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.