Belarus vs Ukraine: Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile over time
- Belarus
- Ukraine
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 44.0% against 42.0% in Ukraine, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 18th and Ukraine ranks 19th of 39 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile, Belarus or Ukraine?
- Belarus, at 44.0% against 42.0% in Ukraine as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile between Belarus and Ukraine?
- 2.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ukraine?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ukraine rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile?
- Belarus ranks 18th and Ukraine ranks 19th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.