Argentina vs Honduras: Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile over time
- Argentina
- Honduras
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 30.3% against 29.4% in Honduras, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 26th and Honduras ranks 28th of 39 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile, Argentina or Honduras?
- Argentina, at 30.3% against 29.4% in Honduras as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile between Argentina and Honduras?
- 0.9%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Honduras?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Honduras rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile?
- Argentina ranks 26th and Honduras ranks 28th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.