Panama vs Peru: Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile over time
- Panama
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 91.4% against 79.0% in Panama, a difference of 12.4%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 9th and Peru ranks 6th of 39 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.0% | 67.8% | 3.1% | Panama |
| 2010s | 74.1% | 78.8% | 4.7% | Peru |
| 2020s | 89.7% | 94.2% | 4.5% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile, Panama or Peru?
- Peru, at 91.4% against 79.0% in Panama as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile between Panama and Peru?
- 12.4%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Panama and Peru rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile?
- Panama ranks 9th and Peru ranks 6th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.