Moldova vs Turkey: Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (%)
Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (%) over time
- Moldova
- Turkey
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 37.1% against 16.9% in Turkey, a difference of 20.2%.
That makes Moldova's figure about 2.2 times Turkey's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 29th and Turkey ranks 32nd of 39 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile, Moldova or Turkey?
- Moldova, at 37.1% against 16.9% in Turkey as of 2018.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile between Moldova and Turkey?
- 20.2%, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Turkey?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Moldova and Turkey rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile?
- Moldova ranks 29th and Turkey ranks 32nd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.