Kazakhstan vs Turkey: Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (%)
Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (%) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Turkey
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 33.2% against 16.9% in Turkey, a difference of 16.3%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 2.0 times Turkey's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Turkey ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 31st and Turkey ranks 32nd of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.8% | 38.0% | 6.3% | Turkey |
| 2010s | 37.2% | 19.6% | 17.6% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile, Kazakhstan or Turkey?
- Kazakhstan, at 33.2% against 16.9% in Turkey as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile between Kazakhstan and Turkey?
- 16.3%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Turkey?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Turkey rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile?
- Kazakhstan ranks 31st and Turkey ranks 32nd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.