Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 40.6% against 39.8% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 25th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 39 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.0% | 36.6% | 7.6% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 28.3% | 36.7% | 8.4% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Brazil, at 40.6% against 39.8% in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 0.8%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile?
- Brazil ranks 25th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.