Belarus vs Uruguay: Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 54.8% against 53.9% in Belarus, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 18th of 39 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.6% | 65.4% | 1.8% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 56.8% | 73.3% | 16.5% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 54.8% against 53.9% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 0.9%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile?
- Belarus ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 18th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.