Belarus vs Poland: Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 62.5% against 53.9% in Belarus, a difference of 8.6%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 19th and Poland ranks 16th of 39 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.6% | 47.1% | 16.5% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 57.6% | 43.9% | 13.7% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 62.5% against 53.9% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile between Belarus and Poland?
- 8.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile?
- Belarus ranks 19th and Poland ranks 16th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.