Chile vs Panama: Coverage of social insurance programs in richest quintile
Coverage of social insurance programs in richest quintile over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 35.3% against 32.9% in Chile, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 19th and Panama ranks 16th of 37 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.3% | 32.7% | 5.5% | Chile |
| 2010s | 35.5% | 30.3% | 5.2% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social insurance programs in richest quintile, Chile or Panama?
- Panama, at 35.3% against 32.9% in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coverage of social insurance programs in richest quintile between Chile and Panama?
- 2.4%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for coverage of social insurance programs in richest quintile?
- Chile ranks 19th and Panama ranks 16th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social insurance programs in richest quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social insurance programs shows the percentage of population participating in programs that provide old age contributory pensions (including survivors and disability) and social security and health insurance benefits (including occupational injury benefits, paid sick leave, maternity and other social insurance). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.