Chile vs Poland: Coverage of social insurance programs in poorest quintile
Coverage of social insurance programs in poorest quintile over time
- Chile
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 49.3% against 43.6% in Chile, a difference of 5.7%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Chile ranks 9th and Poland ranks 8th of 37 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.7% | 41.5% | 10.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 32.8% | 43.4% | 10.5% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social insurance programs in poorest quintile, Chile or Poland?
- Poland, at 49.3% against 43.6% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage of social insurance programs in poorest quintile between Chile and Poland?
- 5.7%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Poland rank globally for coverage of social insurance programs in poorest quintile?
- Chile ranks 9th and Poland ranks 8th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social insurance programs in poorest quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social insurance programs shows the percentage of population participating in programs that provide old age contributory pensions (including survivors and disability) and social security and health insurance benefits (including occupational injury benefits, paid sick leave, maternity and other social insurance). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.