Belarus vs Poland: Coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile
Coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 50.6% against 44.4% in Poland, a difference of 6.2%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Belarus ranks 6th and Poland ranks 9th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.0% | 48.2% | 2.1% | Poland |
| 2010s | 50.4% | 45.1% | 5.3% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile, Belarus or Poland?
- Belarus, at 50.6% against 44.4% in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile between Belarus and Poland?
- 6.2%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Poland ranks 9th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social insurance programs shows the percentage of population participating in programs that provide old age contributory pensions (including survivors and disability) and social security and health insurance benefits (including occupational injury benefits, paid sick leave, maternity and other social insurance). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.