Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile
Belarus
50.6%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
50.5%
in 2020
Belarus rank
6th
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 50.6% against 50.5% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 37 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 50.6% against 50.5% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.1%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social insurance programs shows the percentage of population participating in programs that provide old age contributory pensions (including survivors and disability) and social security and health insurance benefits (including occupational injury benefits, paid sick leave, maternity and other social insurance). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.