Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage of social insurance programs in 2nd quintile
Belarus
45.5%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
48.8%
in 2020
Belarus rank
9th
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Coverage of social insurance programs in 2nd quintile over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 48.8% against 45.5% in Belarus, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 9th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 37 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social insurance programs in 2nd quintile, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 48.8% against 45.5% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage of social insurance programs in 2nd quintile between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage of social insurance programs in 2nd quintile?
- Belarus ranks 9th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social insurance programs in 2nd quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social insurance programs shows the percentage of population participating in programs that provide old age contributory pensions (including survivors and disability) and social security and health insurance benefits (including occupational injury benefits, paid sick leave, maternity and other social insurance). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.