Indonesia vs South Africa: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Indonesia
30.9%
in 2022
South Africa
39.9%
in 2021
Indonesia rank
8th
South Africa rank
6th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Indonesia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 39.9% against 30.9% in Indonesia, a difference of 9.0%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Indonesia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 6th of 27 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.3% | 38.0% | 33.7% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 12.0% | 41.7% | 29.7% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Indonesia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 39.9% against 30.9% in Indonesia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Indonesia and South Africa?
- 9.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Indonesia and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Indonesia ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 6th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Cash Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)