Ecuador vs Poland: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Ecuador
54.3%
in 2022
Poland
35.3%
in 2019
Ecuador rank
3rd
Poland rank
6th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Ecuador
- Poland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 54.3% against 35.3% in Poland, a difference of 19.0%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.5 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Ecuador ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 6th of 30 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.5% | 37.8% | 30.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 25.1% | 36.9% | 11.7% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private transfers, Ecuador or Poland?
- Ecuador, at 54.3% against 35.3% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private transfers between Ecuador and Poland?
- 19.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Poland rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Ecuador ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 6th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Domestic Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)