Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Kyrgyzstan
39.7%
in 2020
Poland
38.2%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Poland rank
13th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 39.7% against 38.2% in Poland, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Poland ranks 13th of 37 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.5% | 45.2% | 23.8% | Poland |
| 2010s | 37.9% | 38.1% | 0.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social insurance -urban, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 39.7% against 38.2% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social insurance -urban between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 1.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Poland ranks 13th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)