Ecuador vs Poland: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Ecuador
35.9%
in 2022
Poland
38.2%
in 2019
Ecuador rank
16th
Poland rank
13th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Ecuador
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 38.2% against 35.9% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 16th and Poland ranks 13th of 37 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.2% | 39.7% | 20.5% | Poland |
| 2010s | 26.2% | 38.3% | 12.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social insurance -urban, Ecuador or Poland?
- Poland, at 38.2% against 35.9% in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social insurance -urban between Ecuador and Poland?
- 2.3%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Poland rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Ecuador ranks 16th and Poland ranks 13th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)