Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Belarus
53.2%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
55.4%
in 2020
Belarus rank
6th
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 55.4% against 53.2% in Belarus, a difference of 2.2%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 33 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social insurance -rural, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 55.4% against 53.2% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social insurance -rural between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)