El Salvador vs Mongolia: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
El Salvador
17.1%
in 2022
Mongolia
15.7%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
16th
Mongolia rank
18th
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 17.1% against 15.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 30 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.6% | 15.2% | 2.3% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 15.6% | 13.3% | 2.3% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -rural, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- El Salvador, at 17.1% against 15.7% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -rural between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 1.4%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for coverage in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -rural?
- El Salvador ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Domestic Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)