Peru vs South Africa: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Peru
2.3%
in 2022
South Africa
2.2%
in 2021
Peru rank
31st
South Africa rank
32nd
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 2.3% against 2.2% in South Africa, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 32nd of 33 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.1% | 2.5% | 0.4% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.0% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 2.3% against 2.2% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.1%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Peru ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 32nd of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)