Mongolia vs South Africa: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural
Mongolia
85.5%
in 2020
South Africa
88.5%
in 2021
Mongolia rank
3rd
South Africa rank
1st
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural over time
- Mongolia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 88.5% against 85.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 1st of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 85.9% | 80.3% | 5.6% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 85.5% | 87.1% | 1.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural, Mongolia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 88.5% against 85.5% in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural between Mongolia and South Africa?
- 3.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 1st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Cash Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)