Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban
Brazil
46.0%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
44.8%
in 2020
Brazil rank
28th
Kyrgyzstan rank
30th
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 46.0% against 44.8% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 28th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th of 39 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.7% | 31.2% | 18.5% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 46.1% | 44.6% | 1.5% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 69.3% | 44.8% | 24.5% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Brazil, at 46.0% against 44.8% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.2%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban?
- Brazil ranks 28th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Protection and Labor programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)