Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Kyrgyzstan
55.2%
in 2020
Poland
50.2%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Poland rank
9th
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 55.2% against 50.2% in Poland, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th and Poland ranks 9th of 33 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.5% | 55.7% | 26.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 41.5% | 50.2% | 8.6% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 55.2% against 50.2% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 5.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th and Poland ranks 9th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)